f rNa«i ?SpS8gS 1^ IM' PRKLIMINARY INVEST I OATIOK OF THE KIXINO OF A PULSATING ilR JKT in A STEAIYSECONDARY AIRFLOF -^ A Th«8l« Subidtt«d to th« Graduate Faculty of the University of Uianesota Charles J. Burton Lt. Condr., U.S. liavy In Partial Fulfillswnt of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Aeronautical Engineering August 1951 ^d • O** I \/*Ml iCKNCWLKDGKUEHTS . '.r "' • Th« Author wishes to express thanks to Dr. Uewmn A. HaII and Professor Thogws L. Uurphy for the^r academic aid and counsel, to the Hary group and Patricia Burton who kindly as- sisted in operating the equipnent and takin^; data, and to Michael Shonberg, £• Kaar, and William Alden for Taluable sug- gestions and material aid in construction of the test set-up. Thanka are also due to the U.S. Na-val Postgraduate LohoQ^ Annapolis* Uafrland, which sponsored the attendeno« of the author at the University of Minnesota as a candidate for the de- gree of Master of L.cience« A j:i»j- -<«» ar. AppndU 40 I i A (^^CL :)K -»* y,XbiTf^ orf* ffo;tnwE »loit; vvsil ©iW o^ ,X«« .q«r-;t»s ie*;^ ^ffd" lo ac -> nl fata XarTocharu ofia is.. TABLE OF COMTEKTS t Sumnary ••••• 1 Introduction ^... 2 The Statenont of the Problem 2 Basis of bolution of the Problem • 4 The i^pparatus 6 General Lasoription of Complste Apparatus • • • 6 The Pressure Sampling Valve •• 8 The Pulsator •.••••••• 11 The iir Plov System 12 Instrumentation • 13 Itiscellaneous Apparatus 15 Test Procedure 17 Test of Serviceability and Accuracy of App8a*atus • 17 Tests of the Flow Mixing Region 19 Discussion of Hesults • 21 The Operating Limits of the Sampling Valve • . 21 The Mixing /.egion Flov Data 24 Conclusions and iLecomnendations •••••••••• 35 Bibliography 39 Appendix ••••• 40 I • T^-liMBBuS S . . . , , .....: i*nl S . . . : /roldc fmH sdT C '>o nf}^&r!ttf>39 8 . il .... .o&BBiu\ or:'r SI . . . TfA 9-?T - i- • ■ ... .. ■••'iv>' sni 81 . tX -fi isDT VI 61 ...... ..-oii aiij lo sdsdi IS . . aHuae^i. lo rtoiaauoaiU IS . . j. ' ' .." I ',■..■■ )■• p ^n f':: r 1 ■ '■-•^■«^f^l" r^-TT i^ anoxd-i a ano .0 CS ihi^^ildlE LIST OF TABLES Table I to X Pijlsatinc I-'low, Cycle of L^anic Pressure 43-52 XI to XIV IrynA^G Pressure Profiles 55-56 XV to XDC Lines of Constant ^"^ 57-61 qo-qs IX Centerline Values of Velocity 62 XXI to XXII Nornalited Velocity P»-ofilfl8 63-64 s by I •7 aairon ho tsij 0V-.Y9 G- .... 68 . *. . . ^ &8 . , . . »vIjeV lelqnflu lol anuO noi;fe*idilis0 smoufiT Zi . An inveatigation of the mixing region of a cool iso* thei'nal pulsating air jet in a steady secondary airstrean at Keynolcis number « 41,000, velocity ratio ■ 0.5, pritnary velocity 200 fps, was conducted by means of a velocity survey of the •» region, utilising a total head tube, static pressure orifioe, and a sampling valve, which by rotation and synchronisation with I- the pulse producing valve, applied a constant but different pressure differential to each one of 36 nanometer tubes in suc- cession, producing a standing wave of dynamic pressure of the pulse cycle. The pulsating flow nixini; region was compared to the mixin^: region of a steady flow Jet of similar configuration and found to differ very slightly, if at all. The mixing re;;ion agreed closely with that defined by previous steady flow investi- gations. «f«ff%tuM»ial.> ■^' ••»• 'r« fi m- The investigation was conducted under the auspices of the keohanical and ieronautioal ii'ngineering l«epartments of the University of Uinnesota in partial fullfillment of the require- ments for the degree of Master of Science. T5IASBSt78 -oal' loos u lo noisen gaixlia i»rfi lo no c;f«3UwTfll ok .eIo\o ©aluq flol^a-x -,nlxli3 mil ALb iB li .x^M:,lU x-^or ne-llib oi bm/ol • aoolitag lo aeolqai/fl •rf;f nobnu ooioubaoo saw aoi?fli^l#Mrrfll aHT •rf* lo aine/ni-iaqati artlneanian-^ Xeo :;hja/ionai bna lBola».''' frr.^^r r rnrf:.! Ia^+1fl^ ,^ s.-Joaa-niy ^o Y^la-iarinU .aoneioc lo 'lo^aak 'io ©e^ , ' ' '" ' "^ 3:f-'am - £ - INTRODUCTKW ««t Th» Stateawnt of the Problem *r Th« nixing of fluid Jet with surrounding fluid hat been inTestigatod analytically "with experimental confirmation by num- erous investigators for various configurations of flow, but has always been limited to the steady flow oases. Based on Prandtl*s mixing length cOTioept for turbulent flow (1) Taa nodified by Taylor (2)], Tollmiea (3) and Kuethe (4) have produced and eon- firiMd theoretical analyses, of the extent and nature of the tur- bulent mixing regima formed by free Jets. Two excellent sunnaries of isotherml and non isotherinal air jet investigations are reports by Cleeves and Boelter (s), and by Shapiro and Forstall (6), the latter report offering use- ful empirical relations for the shape of the mixing region. • ciflK< Unfortunately, the non-steady flow case in which there exist pulsations of a random nature, and even that case in which the pulsations are regular, have not lent thenselvea to analyti- cal treatment. It is felt that statistical methods will soon be brought to bear on the subject with productive results, but it is also desirable that sup;;lenentary data be introduced by ex- perinental investigations. - s - i!T o ^£i«4n»J'4C/3 erfT , i.i'7,, rj' »(3) lo^Xeo?. bna aeveel'J vd achtof|0"s ©ts ano ^evai a -aat; -rlit oqoi istctsl &.nt ^(d) IXe.ia-roS bfra o*itq*»cf^. vrf btiB otJwiJ' ;ioiuW ax e^;-. Toi'i v^BB^z-'iioa ©ret .xJ-'-^-^'S'"'-""^'^'^'^ rfoldw ni d8B0 iarii n©T» bn« ,e*ii;;*Bn mobnai « lo oaolimzivq &9lxm do li&oa II X'.. di}^iiJ&is imoiiiit^B^L imii J'is'l ai ,,'i:>J:::jA ij - '- 3 - i- Th« d«»ign •ngineer of turbojet, ramjet or pulse jet •ngina combustion chambers is oonTronted with a need for design data concerning the nixing of fuel vapor and air under hijjhly turbulent conditions, often times under conditions of regular pulsing flow as in the cat^c of the pulse-jet en>^:ne, or when resonant conditions exist in the oombustion chanbers of other types of jet engines. viLive :^ — It has been found by Godsey and Toun^^ (7) that such oonditions exist in a £;as turbine eonbustion chamber as evidenced hy observed fliokerln£; of the flame front position at frequencies in 6000 cps, 250 to 600 ops, and 25-60 cps regions • And Scur- look (8) concludes that rou^. burning is due to random fluotua- tions in the mass flow, caused by fluctuations In the pressure drop which are in turn caused by random fluctuations of the frac- tion burned 3n any cross-section; and that resonance or flutter ooours when the period of vibration is the resonant frequency of some part of the system* It is felt that a study of the basio mixing problem is a neeessary prelude to further studies involving actual combus- tion. It is the purpose of this lnvesti£;ation, then, to show the extent of the nixing region of a low frequency pulsating air jet In a steady secondary air flow by means of a velocity survey of the region. - £ - iOfJ*: a ).' ; n T '^ f» -> .-■'■• ■ • r - , . J an od- »UD ai ^ain". Xonoo (,::} :»ooi K . •( rr - 4 - B»«ia of Solution of the Problea -:•♦» f ar •oc^i levrstl or . The approach to this phase of the problem is experi- nental in nature. The axial velocity field oan be charted by ■aking a survey of the mixing region with a total head tube and static pressure taps. The difficulties involved in measuring non- steady pressures can be overcome, if the pressure variation is periodic, by use of a sampling valve which presents an open passage to a particular raanoDoter at one point in the pressure cycle only and at the same point each oycle. Assuming no leak- age from the tube during the rest of the cycle, the particular tube then is subjected to a steady pressure rather than a vary- ing one. Use of many tubes, each recording a different point in tVie cycle then produces a standin^^ wave of the pressure pulsa- tion. Static pressure readings oan be taken at the ed^e of the flow for all points within the flow at a particular cross- •aotion. Prandtl (l) has shown and Tollmien (S) has confirmed that the static pressure is constant across the jet within very •Mil limits. Direct comparison of the mixing region of a pulsating jet and the mixing; region of a steady jet of similar strength will provide a measure of the pulsation mixing region ss well as - ^ - floi:tsxi«v o*iiJ6bt»iq d.ii 1i »aijooii.vo »d aao aaiuaaetq x^aoi -non ;> fTB 8oWt»»f'Tq xioi:tw &vlav ^ailqfflae b '^o eau '^cJ ^wxbotn^q ei -38010 iBlooitiftT s *» woll ©ft* fliiC^fw aiflfoq iia io r woll ii& bo-n-'ir'co aerf (S) a«iraXIoT bnB nirods epj: (I; I:^brtei»t .ffol^oea XXi rf:^ ... >n.-ti: -teiiwre ybaotr a ?o rroiT^Bt -nlxiffl wf+ hnn :t»^ ae ii ■ iTjiJfioiuc; en." lc s'tj-savc a s;uv-v:i:; t i. J. « - 5 - its relationship to the stmidy flow case, for this particular ooafiguration. 0 ixQv i^iacA vniaa aiYia .il V x<^ .^1 : c , lino sniipaawi •i<;t .XOB1UOOU nil iv) - 7 - b«r and which surrotmaed the primary flow exit line concentrical- ly* The secondary flow was then exited from the drum into a square "tell" which had an entrance dimension of 11 x 11 Inches and which tapered smoothly to the 6 3/16 inch square test section to permit smooth entrance of the secondary flow into the test sec- tion, surrounding and concentric to the primary air jet. iiight- een-mesh screen xas placed 14 inches upstream in the flow to as- sist in getting isotropic small scale turbulence at the test section entrance. The test section consisted of an 8 ft. lon^- square duct constructed of angle iron reinforoed, smooth ^ in. plywood. One side of the duct was constructed to slide so that the total head tube and static orifice located in the sliding panel could be placed at any desired station, lonf;itudinally, in the test section. The downstream end of the duct was opan. The total head tube and static orifice pressure leadt were connected to a rotating sampling Talve which was synoronised with the rotating; btitterfly valTe so that a standing wave of total pressure minus static pressure could be produoed on a bmnk of U-tube nanometers. » j.;xifr»- bsbrf.r.'OTijjs iioff^/r bim IMtf ©liBwpa a o;fn.i auxD ^:i-: .zoti tojixs norir 3, ■■ j.i«o,iu:jB£: »ril .^i bflB aerfoni II x I^ to aotantiib eoneicfne n« fasri riocrfw "IXscf* r.T rtiir:fo32 :?3'-»d- otfir'os 'bnl dXNs 9 -^rfr ",■* vlncfcore boneqs* rlr>fi-fw -06S JaoJ Ow- ocJ-.ii wol'j. ^leiJaoooa oilc^ -o ovi->:ii-Jae njooxas Jirrneq -;tri; ■ . .iB(, ii» xtBaitq erfi oi^ oii;tnooi3oo bae j^nlbnuetisiz ^not& -»« od- won «'"?.'■ -'•' nBii-f.T:;aii r:-jj~'on' M b30flla I'-iV.' .i&^ioe iiasiB-neo ^a»;J 9il:t ;t» t*0iii7x jdiuJ elaos ilBi^.a a^qoiJciai ryxi;!^©^ ai ^axs etai'pa T^nol ,:f*t 8 nil lo bsc^slanoo noid^ooa ;taad a/fT l|«^^jv. ,i -•■-»■/■■'- . •; o r-. Trt*'- ■ JT • ''■'* f'.«-»') I ''1 4 » ' •( . -T "'■'sub lAio^ erii^ &mti& oa obila ow uo.i^stu'ijaAoo ^j^w io>/i^ «»fki^ lo aula aiC) bXffoo IwTR-^ -T^brlp »KH^ rrt bnH-aooI aoillto oLi-«:ta bita ©duct baaxi .fiaqo aaw &oub arij "^lo bna nijBan^anwob anl .xiO£>rofl>« eb>'. >I 6iyaa»iq aotlino ofiad'a btta &tf»;f baeH la^^ ©riT bea cnoinnya sav; an/'^w ©vfar ;;f?fJ:'-ffB •;rTf:J"B;to'T b or* fTO'> ">t»w "l-.' ■'V8W ^n' ..■nayz a /en^ oc pri.-.j' vj, I'jt^r-: 'j -r' . r?.. ; •- i.i',- rs.-i'v ^oad 0 no baoubotq acf bluoo aii/aeaiq oUocfs euaiB! a-u v.. «.--*• -..'' .Mn,- ! /, ^■.-.t'^. r-.ri-.vn (A-- 5<-''^:»f fill .••i»,,'ri- t, J) ©vXev c BJoi x^ fa»oui)9*i ad ruo rioinw "torn© lo »o*iwo8 « ai »7.'JWi-. -J". - - ^^ / o. .'Si,. I'd. .iW.. . 1 .• ,iaqT CgYX tcMov Oil ,^ ^ « ^ rmrlib aew 9\rX«v o*p» i^.i^nm* ♦h<» isqoer* \ - 21 - b«^auo« zl ftotllio 5 .2. A faiflbnacts A, - i3 - Inst runentat ion prasa rygtm^ n/'f fTiv^ ■'>" ^■Jrrr: sis'* r*^!*' The total presaure was measured by a 0.028 inch O.D. total head tube of the Kiel type, which has a vonturl shield surrounding the tube tip to insure flow nornal to the 0.017 Inch IaD« tube opening;. The pitot tube shaft was ^ inches O.D. brass which was nounted in a ^ inoh thiok plexiglass plate throu{;h a fktfJttrooT paokin^j; gland so that the probe oould be noved later- ally across the test section width. The plexiglass plate also contained a l/d inch dianeter static orifice. The plate was Bounted in the sliding wooden panel of the test section so that it oould BOYS up and down independent of and/or longitudinally with the panel J thus, the probe could be positionad at any point potas in the whole test section duct as desired. The pressure difference, ^, between total pressure and static pressure was indicated on the U-tube Banoiaeter bank pre- Tiously described. The pressure drops acroas the square edged neasuring orifices were measured with well type water-filled manometers. The pressure taps froB the orifices were located In accordance with A.S.M.K. standards for "radius taps", Ref. (9), the up- stream tap bej n,3 located 1 diameter froB the upstrean face of the orifioo and the downstream tap ^ dianeter from the downstreaa -si- ne «0 fi •^<< heiv'SBod SBW »i£»3S«nt3 LinAf^^ ©li'f f TOlcfoaa &%»i 9Ai to Li-poq noJboow ;,ni51X« •ri^ oi i>e. • hfidxtoaob ^^Xduolr iija«e0i be;:^bn enoi'pa ftHi aaoioa sqonb eiuaaoiq arlT ,«n^ ,Tr h9lXn-iA(tew eqv;* Xlew t^ibn hmt'.isftw* <*n«rtii ••oiliio -qu ©i-li »(C) .1© J auibaa" •xo'i abn^n«;tB .a.M.a.A rfilw - 14 - face of the orifice. The atatic preaaure holes wera ^ inch dia- nater and free of burrs and reatrictitms with ali^^tly rounded edgaa. The static pressure level at the upstream tap was mea- sured on the sane nanometer used to Measure the pressure drop by clampicg the lead from the downatream tap and removing its other end froc the nanometer, causing the nanometer to indicate r,age pressure Juat upstream of the orifice* The tenperaturea at the orifices were measured by Iron- eonstantan thierrr.ocouples Inserted in the flow upsteam of tha orifioas in acoordanoe with I.S.IH.E. Standards. Temperature readings were made on a Brown direct indicating potentiometer. Tl-ia orifices were maae to A.S.li.E. Standards and were ■aohined to an inalde diameter of 1.008 inchaa and 4.002 inohaa for the 2 inch primary line and the 6 inch secondary linea re- apactlTely. ji^^. »-5a»a: A oheok on the accuracy of the orifices waa mada poaai* ble by the insertion of a maaauring orifioa at the blower inlat, whioh panaittad a maasurccent of the total maaa flow to oorapara with tha aun of the flows through the primary and secondary linea aa Indieatad by tha other two aaaauring orificea. r^ rr ^T77 i»A . as-jfco ic- Hv": ft'tvr:; lo Olfle -•"IB -iU -•1 «c yj^'ifta a«oiliio ^•n fq iionf S ft^'* t«'^ , Viuv Lv' -j^-^^i 'tzmoq mhaa a.sv- • Of . aoo diij no iio*ilt:« a - 16 - Miie«ll«noou8 Apparatus p thm -yrmwMurm Flow Pipes. The A.S.M.E. code on fluid measurement does not recognize the use of any pipe snaller than 2 inch I.D. Consequently, 2 inch standard galvanized iron pipe was used for the primary flow line and 6 inch I.D. snooth rolled black iron tubing for the secondary flow. Surge Tanks. In order to prevent pulsations from the prioary flow fron affecting the measurino orifice in that line, a the orifice was placed in series between two 7 ft. by 2^ ft. cylindrical tanks which served to damp out pulsations originated fron either side of the valve. c*- at— imy 4i«« tyfs biHarfiy ^^ Since the pressure variations in the secondary flow line, caused by the pulaationa in the prinary flow line, were -i M«h staller eompared to total flow, and since the secondary flow orifice had a dianeter ratio of 66 2/5 per oent it was felt that Ihms capacity was needed to insure steady flosr at the secondary flow orifioe. Therefore the only surge tank used was a 22 inch x S5 inoh steel drum placed between the possible source of pulsa- tions (the test section) and the orifioe. This drum served the additional purpose of a stilling chamber to aid in establishing a smooth isotropic entrance flow into tho test section. »t rpeseoepti fre^meaa^. ' di " Buctanacc-; h e^ ••' ij .C.I rfofli S ^«.i:^ T»II«a8 &q£q X^» "» •»" •^'^ osiixsoosT Jon ^u ,o'> hi9*y' 3SW »^'tq noil besiftarlBS onBbns.+a xionf S ,^^1 J-nenpeaxKiO ^oTx un.v. .....loi dc^oorai . ..-^ ^n-.r n b-=' orrJI troll vttr^rir v.: j.« Xjj „., .^-^ y Q^j. j,r,f^^,-t©cf ««?"n»8 PI f bftoslq atrw ©oHino ©rii noil •it«L;iou«ii 3ilw oo;u3 jrta ^vtoLI x^::o^ .- ;r-iiiLv;. u -...ilsiifB riooa ;t«rii ;tIol asw ;H :^n80 loq S\S 36 lo oi:^ai neiamflib a bad ©olll-to viAbnooea "'-f-* <'^ "•'' T"' v'lasita onuan^ oi .bsbssn saw \:;tJto«qao aaal ^x ifont SS a aa» uaau /Inac^ o^ija \ifio D;i:r anuio-ion. .ooitcio n-oll -aalucT lo aonuoa sidi 2Boq o/iJ" neoir*ad bsoalq rawib leads rioni t.S ::J-a© Bi oi» OJ* Tecmano ^niliija t. lo saoqiwq imicxJiDoa + orf* o:J'fli woi'» oonand-na oxqonrtoai ri*o««« a - 16 - Throttling Orific«» In ord«r to build up the pre8«ur« l«Tel of the air supply to the primary line so that a greater range of air flofw control Blight be obtained, an orifioe with an area ratio of 66 2/3 per cent was placed in the six inch line Just downstream of the take-off of the 2 inch line. Then Just ahead of tho 2 inch line entrance to the first surf^e tank a (;*te Talve was inserted in the line to pernit Tariations in the pri- ■ary air flow velocity. No provision was made to control the secondary air flow except by variation of total flow through changes in blowor speed. The f'ulsator. The source of pulsations in the prl- ■ary flow was provided by a 2 inch dianeter disc type butterfly valre which rotated in the pritaary flow pipe. The valve com- pletely closed the passage when closed, thus the air flow varied froB zero to naxinum. The butterfly valve was connected to the •ampler rotor shaft thirough a lt2 gear ratio. The reduction gaar synchronised the sampler valve and butterfly valve since one revolution of the butterfly valve constituted two complete pres- sure variation cycles. The frequency of pulsation was adjusted by the variable •peed pulley system and was controllod during, runs b. use of a stroboscope to accurately attain and maintain the desired pulse frequency. - 31 - anfl r nl '>f»«»«»In sew ol^tBt «ei» •d-^j • a iV« ;tBiil art* O* ©oneis^na »ixli rioni S diij lo utt^dB -ft.-, o.i:t nl znot&BiiBv ttiaifiq of arrli ^ »«» ©▼!«▼ fT^it^-l -i ! a,^i-> ■> p f ?•, "rt^flsw*"'' :'.nnf ~j . \Jk7_..i'-' -^■.jT: "; ! ji.':j U'/.J -'•- ... - J/X«V Y^"^''"^"*"" '^'''' """' '•<■• ' *'''I'"V.-T . 3 o i ;> V3 no X J A i tmv itiaa •idattipr »rid y/i b»rr»jjf;b« 2«w nolctaaljjq Ic 'etl o« 1 B ••»■/■; .«7aei Xi« -Wi -7»8B« '•q .« »v .ioT •Xl.iv >{Ij«o Br:(«»X btI«t ori;t e box BUVTtiMefiM: oAS ot •▼X«t ori:^ ■oi'^t tbt^L -'•Tv»a«rrr ««f+ rr;^ "ssrlo 9yi»n bt' .noiionvlL •ba •■« vrXarr aia:^ ar. v*t«!j inn*: nin anl^iisa id - 18 - b«ini: about 200 fp6 and 100 tps , re8pectlv«ly» The system was checked again for leakage. The effectiveness of the sur^^e tanks was then checked by varying pulsator rpm and noting the effect on the manonetere connected to the steady flcm sections* In tt^e range of 200 to 300 rpn no evidence or pulsations reaching the steady flow section was noted. The soouracy of the neasuring orifices was checked by oonputing the flows in the primary and secondary lines and coB" paring their survs with that flow measured by the orifice at the blower intake, uood agraanent was found. .•/.< ..^^^^ . o' too The effect of the length of the tubing connect in^ the total head tube and the static orifice to the valve was checked by comparing the reaciin£;8 on the manoneter board using two sets of pressure loads, one set with the connection as short as pos- sible, the other with 50** leads. Ko difference was found for these two lengths, consequently the 50" length was used for all readings. This was ex^Mcted, since tho natural resonant freq- uency for a 60* tube with (me end open is on the order of 4000 cycles p9r minute and is higher for shorter lenf;th8. The tubing used was 3/l6 ID, thus not so small as to introduce capillary or extreme friction and attenuation effects. awnrm^ Vo drifting or pulsating of the water eolanns In the Manoneter bank was observed during any of the check rims. - 81 - MV iae;t«X8 e.'fT ^\L»rt&99qtmi ,tql 001 bne aql OOS rfuocJ* era onr n : rmeT sr jq 1o •onabtr© en nqt OOS o# COS "io B^aat -v xr.'-t'SCa'a ' 4*\Ca O ' «! ^ ^^ bs'citn\o ajiw evlenr M(i o:^ bne f*do# ~'B ' c to# IDl Lruc .abaoX "OU ni.;w lonto #0.^ t»IdJ:a lie to^ im. 3r 'f ,-f-I "06 orf:? vit^ocnsanor; . »ff-*^n»I ow;f •••di -pail -rflAncaen ieiuj*iu ;^ :t ,JU«j^uo».|X© tfew airfT .£,)flfb»»T Ci Control of the airflow was siaintained by throttling the driring en^ina, using tha prassure drop across the primary flow maasuring orifies as a reference. This -value could be nain- talned constant to within 0.2 in. of water with little difficulty. The initial run was a calibration run, tnade with the sampler Talve rotating at 250 rpm. For a series of known steady flow values of d^oianie pressure, "q", (total pressure minus static pressure) ranging from 5 inches to 16 inches of water, water - ei - avX«v bam enl^an - ^lUOOB lO 99' Sib 'Oft ffOlh f^TfrtBSSTfT 3di •" -n'i« ■ 'i '34... ev sc'M .f'' ■ . : 1 E 3ii jjai!; • ■ > - wcfit .;T£ S.C aiif^-fw . 0^ .tin aol&miQ imo a sew hot X»li-inx sHT im te amiont bi o& a- aasiq - 20 - le-7ois for all tubes In th« nmomoter bank were loarked for each ■q" value. Other calibrations were made later in the tests for tht purpose of naintainiOj:; an accurate calibration of the Talve. The pulsating runs were then Mide by eoAneoting the butterfly valve to the sampler valve and markin^: the water levels of the nanoneter bank tubes for each probe position. The trav- erse consisted of readings taken each 0,1 inch starting beyond the noszle center line and continued through the nozzle centerline position to a distanoe of 2*5 inches from the centerline* This was accomplished for a series of stations cosunencino at the nozzle exit and continued to a distance of 39 noszle diameters downstrean. For comparison with the pulsating flow tests, similar traverses were nade with the butterfly valve disconnected frotn the sanpler valve and in the full open position. Hare, two traverses were oadc. One was made at a prinsry nuiss flow iden- tioal with the pritnary mass floa existing durin{^ the pulsating runs, 80 tliat the average velocity from the nozzle sliould be tlie sasM in both conditiona« The other traverse was Bside at an ar- bitrary value of flow such that the q at the nozzle centerline at the exit was the sasM as the q at the peak of the oycle of the pulsating runs* (saAta* >■>« ^»r-y • cs - ► V-t.' ano i A ■•■ f nt.'^ia&nitm lo : «ri:f .1 TfrltesCirr -.3 9rf^ -•M ra fp. o^sR aaw fit Mh>t - 21 - L. iilQM OP E2SDLTS»tr^^ ♦>«» re*cr «nd The Operating Limits of the Sampling: Valre WoBg (11) dtserlbet in sone detail the limitationSf oep«biliti«8» end idiosyncraoies of the sampler TalTe. In brief, the major aource of error is leakage across the vsIto whioh Taries with the pressure differential applied across the ^alre, the direction in whioh the Ap is applied, the speed of rotation of the valve, and the spring pressure which holds the outer cas- ing against the rotor* rotor- ^r,A ','/• «« im' 4 tmr fih9mm iMrtl«ttle^ %**t The speed of rotation of the Talve affeots the lealcaco in several ways* First, it deternines the temperature of the valve wVdch varies the viscosity and sealing power of the lubri- cation film. This establishes an upper limit of about 300 rpm beyond which the valve overheats rapidly. Low valve speed per- mits excessive leakage by proloneing the time interval during which leakage from the valve can occur between the successive in- stants when a particular nanometer tube is subjected to its particular Ap at its point in tl.e oycle. This places a lower limit of about 200 rpm upon the vaivt. Most oritioal are the dynamic effects of rotation. The valve rotor is not supported independently of the ou'er oaainfr but ratl.er is supported in a ■anner similar to a Journal bearlr^:; and as in the case of such - IS - avIflV ;^nilqgfl^ arid" "lo e^tiatd ^ni&MisqV »riT ,'ieiitf nl .5>Tlftv lelqnwa atii lo aoioBnonxeoibx una .s-^i .;^j j. rjsq»© aiC^f lo •rw;t«nsqra©.t srfct aenxcnsiefa &L td-sic. .a^aw I«n©v»8 ill -Itdr'I 9rf:J to •j-'Voq *2nil3'?3 bna vl^aoa!^ 9.''+ 5t7t-BT .it;'-^'^ <^tIot -n»q b««q« avX«T woii ,'<(Jibi<]Bi »do«ri;Jiia >.r ^ i^Kit CCS d-«od» **© ^iwll be; ^H af to.fon •riarr •riT .aoi.tsdon to - • ofnanyb m fit hm *■-{(>! rr-.'- -f<^'»Tt 4rfr' .r.?.^r.,rv -fo /' ,-.,)+ -^z) '^X;trr«»bpf»q»i»n2 .(Oiis lo »<»«M> wtJ ni •ta©J X«muoi, w od- laXxola -tnnaaa - 22 - ft bMiring* rot«tion buiXdi up an air filn between the rotor and casin^ and « circumferential pressure gradient is established i^.ioh is a function of the speed of rotation. jr i.* ■ The TalTe is thus aeon to be very inflexible in its present configuration. D.xf»^y9r, by reuiainin;; within the limits dictated and by remoTing the maximuTn number of variables it is possibloj by calibration, to remove most of the error. Conse- quently, for this test a constant sprin^; pressure was applied, ■ constant rpa was used, the pressure leads were attached with the lower pressure always connected to the narrow end of the rotor, and the valve was oalibrated for these particular test conditions by applyin^j a series of known steady Ap values to the rotating valve and narking the readings of the manometer tubes. From these readings a set of oalibraticm curves over the range of 5" to 16* of water were plotted and found to be almost linear, as indicated by ffon;> ?!>;• 16 is a calibration curve in- cluded as an example. The other calibration curves arc not in- eluded sinoa they apply only to this very particular combination of tast conditions. It was found desirable to run all the actual flow tests during the same test period since the calibration of the valve changed from day to day as the amount ant. condition of lubricant and other factors chan,';:;ed. Check runs made on other days re- - ss - h*^ a;H zs. •KJ - y6 t- -B^ 8^ in*- -es- quired that n«w ealibrations be nade. The need far extrene care in controlling; the operation of the sampler valve. I.e., the necessity for babying it, the necessity for continuous reoalibration, and its inflexibility, gre^Jtly reduce the scope of any testing done with it. The lati- tude of possible test conditions Is narrbireS'lrjr' these lliai%«*»'** tiona and the tine consucaed ir. obtaining;;;, reducing anc recheck- ing data is enornous. Nevertheless, it seens to be capable of ton «V producing reproducible results within its linitations. piu^ii»i«r . i.'y 1^/* +2 .-,-,.-jg(^ ^f. rl*v nelqfflfta arid" ^ - 24 - The Mixing &»gion Flam Data For the purpose of definition, the nossle exit is taken aa the ori£;iQ of ooordinatos used in plotting the data. The dis- taxKje alon^ the nossle oenterline is denoted by iL poaitiTe dovn- D atream# in noxxle diaueters. The lateral distance froa the aos- zle oenterline is 2L Thus y « 0.5 is the boundary of the noszle and X • 0 is the atation at the nossle exit. IT T>ie value of 250 rpn used in these tests was arbitrary* prescribed by the limitations of the sampler valve, it not being practicable In the preliainary inveati^tion to consider the effects of pulse frequency as a paraneter. The foTB of the pulsation wave was not controlled* The butterfly valve produces a flow varying fron sero to naxiiaunt of a form sotnewhat sinilar to liarnonio wave shape. The data is plotted in terms of dynaoiic pressure, 1 0 u2 q s Pq'Ps * tg> ' • iiince the quantity q is proportional to the £o square of the velooityc ^t shows pressure variations more dis- tinctly than a velocity plot. Fig. 17 in the appendix is a con- version plot of q to Yelocity, at the test conditions. For a ratio of q values, as in Figs. 14 and 15, no conversion is needed since a velocity ratio equals the square root of its correspond- ing q ratio. Key velocities and velocity ratios are indicated - >s - -8 7 «o : I :'rft a -ton *.J a lo ar T ^/ps due to throttling Bd^bt be expected to travel and very nuoh !••• than the local velocity of sound, at •• w«a tour v***!^ which approximate speed snail pressure variations would travel. i possible explanation is that the major portion of the phase difference was due to the nature of the production of the pulsa- tions. It is poasibla that the peak velocity through the butter- fly did not oocur exaetly at the full open position. If nost of the reduction in aasa flow occurred when the butterfly was within* - 3S - &9^SS £SO 9V i';.--rtT'f: ■0':r«r:vL 'if?;* :/ :^v -ii'l .•"08 / si "file rjsJXI" 01109 i leool ^ Yitav bne Xot«*s# ^i' - 26 - o ■ay, 30 of the closed position, then the mininuia velocity would occur when the nass flow «a« at a low level and the flow area was inoreaaing, as at the 45^ to 55^ position beyond the closed posi- tion. Similarly the peaJc velocity would occur when the noass flow was at a high level and the flow area beinc reduced, as at about the opposite part of the cycle. This would place the peak velo- o city at about 60 past the full open position of the butterfly, or about 100 past tube 27, i.e., at tube 1 of the sampler. The important fact relatin- to this invest! gat?. on was that the sampler measured a standing wave which did not drift .tent or pulsate. .e^d iT"i — -r**-- hac on be«^- The wave f orra in the pulsatini; Jet is seen to be fairly l^ciBlar. The scatter of data points is less than was expected, and curves wore plotted throU(!;h the points where eviclenoe of cyclic variations occurod so that resonant vibrations, if any, or other oyollo irregularities night be dlsoerned. However, no oons latent evidence was found that i|Hpa:thatic vibrations were introduced into the systetii as had been the eaee in the work of Becker anu iTiong. ,:•,>•»* :lj5^V3«T .^iif^ ^00 a«oI*«lTflv olXov/0 T-^ .-r.+ i'i »'<■ o8»o orfd^ n*; 3 •/<:f od^ - 27 - oloaod position. •^^■^■■yl< * yMi^*^* Pressure pulses -were transnittod to the secondary flow region, even at station i « 0, causing a q variation which aver- aged 0.5 in. of water. This was transmitted to the secondary flow outside the jet nixin^; region as a variation in static pres- sure. To confirm this, cyclic measurements of p^ - p^tm "^^ P« " Patm w®re inade at 5. = 0. The value of p, - Puto *** ^o^nd to vary from -0.23 in. H2O to -0.68 in. H2O, a total variation of 0.45 in. H29. The Kiel tube would not have been a suitable instrument for total head measurements had the flow configuration been such that fles were c}.osen so as to have profiles of the peak, the minimun, and an intermediate portion of the cycle. That Intermadiate value was chosen which l^ad a q^ equal to that of the steady flow traverse which Jiad been made with a primary nass flow equal to the prinary mass flow of the pulsating flow. This permitted a direct comiwirison of a pulsating flow and a steady flow which r had the same mass flow and same average velocities* i".^ It is noted tlat due to the inability to control thtf sacondary air flow and the f)sct t^iat less blower speed was neo- •ssary in the steady flow case to produce jdantical mass flows for pulsatin{^ and for steady flews « the secondary flow was less for the steady flow case. rov/ever« the change was small* the ratio of aeeondary velocity to primary velocity bain<; 0,45 in the steady flow case and 0.53 for pulsatin;^ flow, the ratio of 0.5 having; bean initially selected as the approximate value de- aired for this invest 1 cation* PlC» 14 and ri-^, 15 make it aeem that the velocity pro- file of the Jet at the nozzle exit was not very flat. However, nndui t> -.ri svuuB n ■Ulif .' 10 aOBl -) M ■i woll aajsa lacflds o fMarr' -"r-* <« iao •3 a -lecfa »' a; ^ of:*rt j>oIev vf &» :, >aao woi'l '^odttJB aik* tc' oictjn x;XIa •n- ioli beiic - 29 - r«a— bwin^ that this a plot of q rather than velocity, on* sees that tha correapondlng Teloolty profile would ba auch flatter. The ed(;e valocity, if cotaputad, is seen to ba 7b% of the caxini;m Telocity, vhich is flatter than the so oallad laminar flow pro- file* Laninar flcar was not desired in this test, and with tha distttrbanoa created by the butterfly and the existing £e3rnold8 number of 41,000 the primary flow is distinctly turbulent. The profiles show two thin<;8 clearly, that a marked similarity exists between the pulsating and steady oases, the pulsatin- flow having a sli^-^htly flatter 5nitial profile, and that the profile In each case showa si^ns of approaching tha flat condition at about £. * 21. At this station, tha ratio of D tha raaxiauia velocity to secondary velocity ist «o/us Pulsating, naximuB v* V 1*20 Pulaatin^;^ niniraura 1.15 iatari Pulsating, interiwdiate ....•• 1.12 Steady, interir.adiate 1.19 ly station — » 27.^, the ratios had beconifai j^'^ orw th\M h <^iadiar: Ptilaating« sttzlnun 1.10 Pulsating, mlniauai 1.10 Pulaatlnc, intariMdiate 1.06 Steady, intermediate 1.10 By station «•- ■ 39, in eaoh ease, the velocity profile aaa not apparent to the aaasuring equipment. This is not in ao« es - -o-w; wo. b»IIfiO OS i^d-d-flii ::t iv >ol9T arid a lo afi;.i« bwc eliloiq o<^vi d^«.• n.i ,€£ « ij ttoi*B:^ii ^{^ o& :hic-(aqq« u^on •■« - 30 - oordanoe nith the work of oliapiro and Forstall (6) who found that for staady flow a "slope coeffiolant", a measure of the nornal- isad profile slope was constant as far downstroam as 140 dia* Meters* However, sinoe velocity alon^ the axis beyond the core of potential flow decreases with increasing r*, nore reliable amd D sensitive neasurin^^ equipment than the saeipler valve will be necessary to carry the investigation further downstream than was done in tris test. tiespite the fact that this investigation was funda- ■•ntally concerned with the direct comparison of a steady Jet and a pulsating Jet having identiwil configurations except for steadiness and non'steaoiness, it was desired, for purposes of •valuatin,-;; the type of steady flow actually attained and eval- uating the accuracy of neasureneat* to compare the mixing ration characteristics with t:iOse defined by previous investigations* One of the nost useful presentations of experinental data and •npirioal relations for jet flows of the nature present in this investicstlon is that by Forstall and Shapiro (6). Anong their findings are that* ^Iti*::'^ (l) All noriaalised velocity (and oonoantration) pro- files tiownatrean of the core of potential flow have strikingly similar shapes which arc substantially independent of fL . fur- ore, these shapes may be represented rather well by several - OS - -Xm '-A.!-! 0. nlttl. lO^ il«T K i •-■.! WVi. arr •ioiirerl- aental data arei (a) The x^ value for the end of the potential corei I) L » 4 ♦ 12 A (b) Velocity decay cGnrnstreaci of the potential s*iT*r core, (x -^L)* *^ ■^' D A comparison of the experinental data of this experi- toant witli the above empirical relations is made 'n Fi^> 14-c and Fig. 14-d. Very close at;reeticnt «as obtained with the enpirioal rate of velocity decay, indicated by the lil slope of the lo^-ar- athmic plots. The exact actual position of the end of the po- tential core is of course indeterminable experimentally because a transition region exists rather than a sharp boundary, as in- dicated by the lack of a sharp break in the experiaeatal plot. However » the approxinate position oan be found by continuing the straight line velocity plots to thialr InberEections. This produces an '^L" position about l.b dianeters less tran the em- - IS - •1-te twvm la 1 ' -T/ '^n .A ^ ^ tot it («) A SI 4 * = .1 :(a^ x} t«lO0 •■1 M , -leo i2tr Iv ■>ia -Tn/ io'i •< S.+ >^ f>' - S2 - pirical value for the steady Jet and about 2.5 diaineters less for tiie pulsating jet* tliia is ooneidered good acreenent* b< «* ore m^ The ▼elocity paranoter *— was chosen to reduce all plots to the same scale, and to eliminate the effect of dissimi- lar secondary flows. This indicates the degree to which the Jet retains its orij;inal excess of velocity oTer the secondary flow, a Talue of """a = 0 thus indicating ooc^lete velocity mixing. A sinilar paraaeter was used for the q plots described later. «.«—«—.. To compere shapes, the profiles were mace dim©nsi*>xv «a»cl\L oeaLuq ooh ^OBa&u jOb ifl:txniC7 rnoqxe ic ti »o«lg X X a -•b briar « n we't ooi DoiaTtlo IS uui^i iB^fimt^ - 35 - the nost significant sine* the unnorinalized velocity profiles differ markedly lj«tween the two stations^ the profile at — • being that one at which definite flattening- of the profile, is first observed. For direct conpariaon, a cosine curve is also shoim and glTes ^ood agreement in tha region where experimental ac- curacy was good. The previous coaparisons then would indicate that tha experimental accuracy of this investigation was better in the regions where larger pressure differentials being measurod than near the edges of the Jet wliere the pressure differentials wera snaller. Kowever, the ^^ood agreement of the data with that of previous investigators indicates that the accuracy of measure- Meats was reasonably good. To actually picture the Jet mixing region, Fi~. 15-ft through i'l^;. 15-e were plotted. These plots delineate lines of constant q, utilizing the parameter °~^ . Tha follow! n.: table, from values in Pig* IS, compares the points at which the center line flofw might be considered nixed to various degrees* - 55 - (Si: >4f»«ai*! r '• ".r- -k (•<''v w ,>. r ^ ^8 ri-stoa mAi ono «-*:*:. o *«nn Gd~ vu6^;JO ariT -e-iyasa: i :>ui} VI J. aaf: - 54 - 1 Value* for lUxing 85^, 68^ aad 55^ Completed: D Pulsating;* naxiouD ^Isating* minimum Pulsating, intermediate Steady, Intenaedlate Steady, maxinn u-u «o' ■«• 0.15 0.32 0.45 xA x/D Vu 35.0 24.5 19.0 37.0 27.0 18.3 36.0 24.0 18.4 35.0 21.0 17.1 34.0 23.0 16.0 Prom the above, the conclusion mi^ht be drawn that the steady floir mixes slightly wkore rapidly than the pulsating flow. Howe-rer, the facts that the accuracy of the absolute levola of pressure Beasuroment by the sampler value is not known, and that tl.e measurenents of the steady flow values are approximate to the extent that flow turbulence caused a nanometer water level fluctuation of up to 0.5 inch of water would lead to a more rea- sonable conclusion that the velocity nixini^ in the steady flow case and the pulsating case differ in no appreciable degree, consistent with the control e^.ercised in this investigation. 'M-Ltmh^w. T\ It - 5JC - wx •>> a\x p J.. . i O.ol a.x-^ ! hX *<•■_ ■V 0.75 O.'jS 0.25 r "~ .,-tA*ft WD± B OC i^Bovn! 2 '? n - 55 - CQHCUJSIOMS ASD RSCOMMBNDATIONS trar. ^« t' With raspact to the aaapling -mlve« the oonolusions to b« draim arei . .^..^r*. . ■« . !• It oazi be utilised in invest igati one of this nature In Its present oonfi juration, but at the ooet of oonaiderable tiae expended in calibration and reoheoking of data. 2. The Talve is extremely inflexible. Its ran.;^e of operation oould be extended and its aocuracy inor eased by elim- inating the bearing action of the rotor and by protidin^ a neans of cooling the rotor and oasing. he Tp 3. When properly calibrated and used vithin its lltBltatiCDS it can pronride reprodaoible data, however, the ac- euraoy of the absolute level of pressure neasursments is not definitely known, and the effects of pulsation form and freq- uency, and of t>ie pressure differential applied across the vav«, upon the accuracy of neasurement could well be a subject of fur- ther investigation. With respect to the test equipment, it is recosmended that a Bore flexible, simpler design patterned after that of ilM Forstall and Shapiro (c) in which the secondary flow is drawn ttirough the test aection rather than blown through would be Mm adaptable to the turbine test cell layout of the Ueohjinioal lio- - as - i:oa«e^o^^ vo»tl'ooa a;*'! bna b' ' »o bXcoo nocJii'ieqo bn« baiBTcTliflo ^^liaqon ." •pail tme itioI no lo a^oello wfi^ :;ns ^/twornl Yle:^ inxleb ^e *«rf:t -ci*:re bemo+ctur rr.^^9b tol . Icffxall s-ioa « ^arf* •rf bXcwv i%uont{:^ n. indict nol^oea cfa»i 9i 0.5, whan pulsations wera foroad by regular interruption of the flow at 250 opm. 2. There was j;ood agreement with the findings of other investigations previously made for the steady flow case thut: (a) The fully normalised velocity profiles down- stream of the potential core are of the same shape, irrespective of the value of 5. and closely resemble a cosine curve. (b) The centerline velocity, downetream of the - S8 - -n •i las ni. I* 'J .'-'^ w'^ u»9;;te 9T fl ^C - 57 - potential core, decays in direct proportion to th« value of -^ (o) The location of the end of the potential core at the center line it closely defined by the enpirieal re- lation L ■ 4 ♦ 12 X S. Ihe close agreement of the data of this investiga- tion in the region w)iere pressure differences were large indicate a reasonably good level of accuracy. The inability to accurately define the outer ed^s of the jet, where t>ie pressure differences are smaller indicate the ne«d for more closely controlled pulsed flow investig;ation8 utilising measuring equipment more sensitive than the mechanical sampling valve used in the experiment. 4. Based on the ratio of the Jet velocity in excess of the secondary flow to the original jet velocity in excess of the secundary flow. "*H* « the centerline flow was considered "o-"8 SS% wlxed at an avera^^e iL • 36 for both the steady and pulsating oases, was 6&^ alxad at an average •=• * 24, and was 45^ mixed at X an average ^ ■ 18. In both oases the steady flow jets appeared to alx slightly sooner titan the pulsating jet, but the accuracy of the data does not justify drawing a firm ooncluaion to that effect. - TS - mis lO £01 (o) •»t I*r >e»olo »1 «♦« >o Off* ;tB *tpi> X §1 4 *• « .: 39or - a;? Xi^iMmiU V 'is 'Ic isv©! iioo^^ \> - • .■■" ^fr "'^ " '•' bn« ,1*^ = ■ ,,.jL^ .^83 ojbw .bb^u-j - 88 - 5. It is reoooawadsd that further invest lotions of tM« nature be Biade to check the effects of variation in pulse frequency, of pulsation forn, of velocity ratio^ /^ » and of Reynolds nunber, upon the nature of the taixin^ region of a pul- aating jet» \S) *C ^^ ^* believed that the uae of i.lgh apead photography coupled with bc>ilieren and/or shadowgraph flow visualisation techniques W^^^t^, FI°^® * profitable avenue of investi^jation. ««iiA6> mJ^'i low f ?«rt #U» M^r 19^ (9) Plov ItoMV*'''*' ^ 19^9. 1.5^.1C!.?. Pfs»r T««t Coda • ■' / • m^^ >*£ ;;ibae«otfc i.:JdO. J., a i-qa. - 8« - •tfrjc: Tf co!:*«,-ter '>n 'o o& •ban ed oiud^an •ixii' - 89 - BIfiLIOGRAPHT (1) "Report on the Investigation of i>e70 loped Turbulence", L. ^andtl, N.A.C.A. T.M. #1231, September 1949. (2) "The Transport of Vortioity and Heat Through Fluids in Turbulent Motion", G, I, Taylor, ?roc« Roy* Soc. 1135, p. 685 and 702, 1932. (3) "Calculation of Turbulent -ocpansion Processes", Walter Tollmein, H.A.C.A. T.U. irl085, 1945. (4) " Invest ii;;at ion of Turbulent Wixin^ He^^iwis Porned by Jets", Arnold U. Kuethe, J.A.M., toI. 2, i?3 pp. 87-95, Septenber 1935. (5) "Isothermal and I«on-Isothernal Air Jet Investigations", V. Cleeves and L. U, I. Boo Iter, Chen. bjig. Prog., vol. 43, p. 123, liarch 1947. (6) "Uomentum and Mass Transfer in Coaxial Gas Jets", Valton Forstall, Jr. and A. 11. bhapiro. Journal Applied Meohanics, vol. 17, Ko. 4, i^eoenber 1950. (7) "Gas Turbines for Aircraft", Gods^ and Young, p. 152, UcCraw-nill, 194J. (8) "Flame Stabilisation and Propogation in High Velocity Gas Streams (100-400 fps)". A. C. Scurlock, MIT Guided Missile Program, Report rl9, liSay 1948. (9) Ploir Measurament, 1949, A.S.I/.f:. Pover Teat Code 19. 5j 4-1949. (10) "The Relative Pressure Lrop Coeffioients for a Square Edged Orifice in Steady and Pulsating FIov", £. K. Becker, Master's Thesis, University of Minnesota, August 1950. (11) "A Study of the Effect that Low hYequency i\ilsations llave on Pressure Lrop Coefficients for a square Fudged Ori- fice". Robert Y. YJong, Master's Thesis, University of Minnesota, August 1951. (12) "The ^ffeot of Pulsations on Plows of Oases", Horace Judd and D. B. Phelay, A.S.M.K. Trans., vol. 44, 1922. - 25 - «t isK- " (e) id. CI ai. •^ S 4* (XI) • SS9X «M .lov , - 40 - strntio* pw4.« iiAiD^.r nrA4;«'.ir/D. .": of APPBIDIX ^COT'Cii "0 0*1. - 0* - - 41 - i. -w HcftBurano LIST Of t] D Hostl* dianetftr. Inches tmmm L Axial distance from noszle exit, in diameters, of end of potential core p Pressure, psia or in. K2O q iiynamic pressure, psl or in« HgO r Kadius, inches r,i liadiue, inches, wl.ere velocity is arithnetic average of aecondan'^ and center line values at any x. a Axial flow velocity at any point X Axial distance fYom nozzle exit, inches y lateral distance from nossle centerline, inches subscripts 1 j Jet ^ 0 Total as in p t naxlKUM as in qo or Uq* p Priaary flow • Statie aa in Pg} secondary flot? as in q^ or Ug. Grmmk Letters > A Differential value ^ Absolute Viscosity ft "sen ^ ^ Density, ^ ^ Ratio of secondary velocity to oenterllne velocity at — ■ 0. - Lb ' Id 1 1 , It I ai^S&pd nfssc'? a 10 c ^ai-o^ssaiJ .11 ^jxxe cii; lo C 81 3C c^n . i i - dj aerfofr alb laixi x 3».-v r ■. ■ . t^n ' T IS * '»'i f? r X • qU 10 op nl a« f; &l' Wr tS^ff f-I«>«lfBd o anf>!*.-^iai iB«^ ' OJ \,JXOOi3V ^'i> ^ A - 42 - 1* Air Flaw Measurement and Calculation '" The orifioaa in the system have been Installed in ac- cordance with A.S.l'.E* Code. The equation used to find the mass flour vast where W « 0.668 Ag fETJ^^p W • Mass flow in lb per sec. ^2 ■ Throat area in square in. K - Flow coefficient K - Area nultiplier for therBMkl expansion of the orifice plate, T • Empirical expansion factor ^ « Upstream density of flowing air Af « ftressure drop across the orifice plate in pel For a typical exaaple of the determination of the nass flow with an orifica plate, see ejuinple 2, psge 7, rof . (9). Calculation of Meynolds Number 2. The Reynolds aunber was oaloulated fron the following equation: 3* The natural frequency of the tube with one end closed is cool- pated froo ti:e following equation} a f « XL - s^ - -o» nf baX. fljedOYa srfi fii aeofliio srfT "O octi ^A-v_U Ij ,098 ^oq Tii iu v.c -.'tOilW raq -?P • rf.hwl'> Iv' l"/tr <- VJ ^.^'; u aA as Ad on J iv ."■_- r j 8 j-t n .. «. r. Xflo iq-^ «oXl xrr **oo f ■I. -sjaJLi-'Oiflo 3flw T'B»ar4ua abic.^ VI ono r{;^±w ei >^. •.noiJi'-"'' - 43 - TABLE X OK CTCm CP imU. FULSITIIG FLOf 1 CYCLE OP DYMAMIC I'RKSSCKL, q, IN INCHES OF WiTER ^ , Distance from fiostle Center, inohes Degreea 0 0.1 0.2 o.s 0.4 O.S 1.0 to 2. .5 , 10 15.70 15.15 14.85 14.10 11.85 9.70 3.55 , 20 15.80 15.30 15.00 14.10 11.95 9.75 3.40 f 30 15.60 15.10 14.80 13.95 11.90 9.G5 3.60 40 15.35 14.85 14.60 13.60 11.40 8.35 3.40 , 50 14.95 14.40 14.25 13.30 11.25 9.10 3.75 ■) 60 14.50 13.95 13.80 12.80 10.80 8.65 3.60 ) 70 14.20 13.65 13.40 13.00 10.55 8.50 3.55 30 13.80 13.25 13.05 12.20 10.30 8.30 3.75 90 13.50 13.00 12.75 11.90 10.00 8.20 5.55 100 12.85 12.30 12.15 11.30 9.40 7.70 3.50 110 12.60 11.90 11.75 11.00 9.20 7.65 3.40 120 12.06 11.65 11.30 10.50 8.60 7.00 3.30 130 11.40 10.85 10.70 9.85 8.10 6.50 3.25 liO 10.90 10.40 10.25 9.54 7.70 6.06 3.15 150 10.55 10.05 9.85 9.15 7.40 5.90 5.15 160 10.16 9.62 9.49 3.75 7.21 5.72 2.90 ; 170 9.95 9.40 9.30 8.60 6.90 5.40 3.05 180 10.13 9.62 9.40 8.75 7.16 5.70 3.00 190 10.45 9.80 9.65 3.80 7.20 5.70 2.70 ; 200 10,60 9.90 9.85 9.00 7.40 6.90 2.85 210 10.70 10.00 10.00 9.10 7.45 6.00 2.85 220 11.30 11.00 10.40 9.55 7.95 6.45 2.90 230 11.80 11.10 10.95 10.10 8.40 6.80 3.50 240 12.30 11.46 11.40 10.40 8.70 7.10 3.80 250 12.60 11.85 11.75 10.76 9.00 7.40 S.85 260 13.05 12.20 12.10 11.10 9.40 7.60 3.80 J 270 13.40 12.50 12.40 11.45 9.70 8. CO 3.75 230 13.90 13.00 12.85 11.85 10.00 6.20 3.70 290 14.10 13.20 13.10 12.10 10.10 8.40 3.60 ) 300 14.50 13.65 13.40 12,20 10.30 8.45 3.55 » 310 14.90 14.00 13.90 12.80 10.80 8.70 3.70 ) 320 15.10 14.45 14.30 13.20 10.90 9.03 3.60 1 330 15.30 14.40 14.40 13.25 11.10 9.10 3.45 340 15.35 14.55 14.45 13.40 11.40 9.40 3.55 350 15.50 14. GO 14.60 13.55 11.45 9.50 3.7 360 17.00 14.95 14.95 13.80 11.70 9.65 - e* - -i^^CklL-'i a ,T3Tn- -• ai.5S 1 a 5.C 0 a»»*qog r.r. . 5 oT.e X c. r ^- ;l Of COaCX oe.s sv.e OT.S 88. S 60. S OG.S i c .e .XX . .i ^'^>. ..1. .xX if =:'>.sx OSI x ■x . X .e ex. ex Ci)I ee.s ovx SI. CI OoX o«x s iS ^ OSS . ex oe.ii ^rs . •■ r??:.?i Oi:^ X OSS r Ods I ov$ I OSf b'^.v wt«j.x oxe 0*6 ■5 ^.o5 - 44 - TABLE II FULSATIHG FLOU CYCLE OF DTSAMIC Ffi£SSU££, q» IN IRCBBS OP WATER Distance fron Sosxle Center, inches ^ Degrees 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 to 2.5 10 15.20 14.50 13.25 10.75 7.10 4.00 3.45 20 16.45 14.75 13.40 10.90 7.06 4.05 3.50 50 15.40 14.70 13.25 10.80 7.06 4.00 3.50 40 15.05 14.35 12.95 10.50 6.90 3.90 3.50 50 14.70 14.00 12.55 10.25 C.65 3.85 3.50 60 14.30 13.60 12.30 9.85 6.45 3.85 3.50 70 14.00 13.70 11.90 9.60 6.30 3.85 3.50 80 13.45 12.75 11.50 9.45 6.20 3.85 3.50 90 13.10 12.40 10.90 9.20 6.05 3.80 3.50 100 12.70 12.00 10.75 8.65 5.80 3.60 3.40 110 12.30 11.60 10.15 8.45 5.55 3.50 3.25 120 11 ,85 11.15 10.00 8.05 5.35 3.40 3.25 ISO 11.15 10.50 9.55 7.80 5.10 3.25 3.05 140 10.80 10.00 9i25 7.60 b.OO 3.26 3.10 150 10.35 9.70 8.70 7.25 4.80 3.05 2.95 160 10.00 9.30 8.55 7.15 4.70 3.00 2.95 170 9.70 9.10 8.20 6.85 4.60 3.15 3.00 180 10.00 9,20 8.40 7.10 4.70 3.50 3.40 190 10.15 9.45 8.35 6.95 4.65 3.45 3.30 200 10.20 9.50 8.30 6.85 4.55 3.50 3.20 210 10.35 9.65 8.45 6.90 4.55 3.55 3.10 220 10.60 9.90 8.G5 7.15 4.80 3.50 3.25 230 11.05 10.35 9.10 7.60 5.00 3.50 3.40 240 11.65 10.95 9.55 8.00 5.30 3.50 3.30 250 11.80 11.10 9.90 8.15 5.45 3.65 3.45 260 12.35 11.65 10.30 8.55 5.65 3.70 3.50 270 12.70 12.00 10.55 3.75 5.85 3.75 3.50 280 12.90 12.20 10.80 9.05 5.93 3.80 3.45 290 13.40 12.60 11.35 9.35 6.1;'5 3,80 3.50 300 13.80 13.10 11.50 9.40 6.25 3.85 3.45 310 14.10 13.40 11.90 9.80 6.40 3.85 3.50 320 14.30 13.60 12.00 10.05 6.40 3.80 3.45 830 14.50 13.80 12.55 ie.25 G.60 3.85 3.50 340 14.80 14.10 12.70 10.35 6.55 3.80 3.50 350 14.90 14.20 12.80 10.60 6.75 3.85 3.50 860 15.10 14.40 12.90 10.65 6180 3.85 3.45 II aauT ,p ,. ,iJi.aiii i IV -MivJiv/ . «5 8©r( c ni » " 3.S o& T.O 8,C S.C ^ ^^ S.G 0.0 a^OTts^ ■%- :. o;,T RT.rr r^s.-r cs.M OS. SI 01 ■ c O^'.S SS.OI 3c. 0T.*« 05,5 Od.S Ot:.^ d». 03.:- ca.o 03.0 3^.8 01. S SG.S 36. S OI.fi OS.?; dl.Ci .11 . i I c>; . ' ■ r a . . i. es*G (■■ b 0Y.3 wO * Vwk CC^L r-c.3 v.>C.-.-i «?C.OI OdI CS.'i cx.e OT.e OTX 0^,3 OS.R OO.Oi oei :;S,t ii'.e 21.01 OCX Co. 3 c-i.e OS. OX iOOS a^.G ea.G :^S.CX OXS 30. S ''0 08 .OX CSS 01. n ?,-:-. -^.i 30. IX oes uo.t gC.OX 3D. XX OI^S C" , ' CX.ii 08.11 oes C so. II sr.ai CDS \> 1 r OT.SX 0?S t - 08. SI OSS G ■ ; Ofr.ex ces C. . * i. 08. 5X ooc c . r OX.H or« ( nt.hf 05e 'JC , vx '. ■ !•• '. ■ 1 Qi*¥i 03B •J. SI Oi^.^I cx.;.x 0»S - 46 - TABLE III PULSATIKG FUM CYCLE OF DYHAMIC P&£SSUKL» q, IN IBCHBS OP WATER X Distance from Nossl« Center, ^nehee Degrees 0.0 0,1 0,2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 to 2.5 10 14.10 13.60 12.60 9.95 7.50 5,00 3.45 20 14.25 13.85 12.70 10.00 7.50 5.05 3.50 30 14.20 13.75 12.65 9.95 7.50 5.20 3.60 40 13.90 13.35 12.30 9.70 7.25 4.95 3.45 50 13.60 13.10 12.05 9.60 7.10 4.95 3.55 60 13.20 12.65 11.60 3.10 6.70 4.80 3.55 70 13.00 12.35 .11.40 9i00 6.65 4.75 3,60 80 12.60 12.15 11.20 8.86 6.65 4.80 3.70 90 12.30 11.80 10.90 8.60 6.50 4.70 3.55 100 11.70 11.30 10.30 8.15 6.15 4.40 3.53 110 11.35 11.00 10.10 8.05 6.25 4.25 3.25 120 11.00 10.60 10.55 7.60 5.6b 4.10 3.20 130 10.35 10.00 9.10 7.05 5.20 4.02 3.10 140 10.00 9.65 8.80 6.70 6.00 3.90 3.10 150 9.70 9.30 8.55 6.55 4.80 3.69 3.00 160 9.32 8.95 8.21 6*45 4.70 3.40 3.00 170 9.00 0.60 7.90 6.10 4.45 3.28 2.95 180 9.25 8.95 8.30 6.50 5.10 3.50 3.00 190 9.10 8.70 7.90 6.10 4.61 3.50 3.00 200 9.25 8.85 8.00 6.30 4.80 3.59 3.00 210 9.40 8.95 8.10 6.30 4.80 3.42 2.79 220 9.94 9.51 8.62 6.85 5.25 3.80 3.06 230 10.35 10.00 9.05 7.20 5.40 4.10 3.31 240 10,70 10.25 9.30 7.40 5.80 4.20 5.30 250 11.15 10.75 9.75 7.70 5.85 4.20 3.49 260 11.45 11.05 10.05 8.05 6.20 4.50 3.50 270 11.90 11.40 10.30 8.25 6.35 4.70 3.61 280 12.30 11.75 10.65 8.50 G.50 4.80 3.50 290 12.45 11.90 10.80 8.80 6.45 4.75 3.51 300 12.80 12.25 11.10 8.70 6.60 4.85 3.50 310 13.25 12.75 11.50 9.10 6.75 4.90 3.56 320 13.40 12.95 11.75 9.25 6.96 5.05 3.80 330 13.85 13.06 12.00 9.40 7.00 5.00 5.55 340 13.^5 13.15 12.20 9.70 7.25 5.10 3.60 350 13.90 13.25 12.30 9.80 7.45 5.20 3.60 3G0 13.90 13.35 12.35 9.80 7.50 5.10 3.48 Ill MAMU \.. U G;. J s - 46 - fgUM If CYCLE OF DTXAUIC rai-:S8UKE, q, II INCHES OF WiTBR DtitindU fron Noszle Centi^, inohae Degrees 0.0 0,1 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.9 to 2.5 10 10.95 10.60 9.25 5.10 3.80 5.56 20 11.25 10.75 9.45 5.25 3.85 3.55 SO 11.00 10.65 9.40 5.35 4.00 3.70 40 10.80 10.55 9.10 5.10 3.80 3.45 SO 10.55 10.25 9.00 5.10 3.90 3.45 60 10,20 10.00 8.66 4.95 3.80 3.60 70 10.00 9.70 8.35 4.85 3.70 3.55 80 9.70 9.50 8.25 4.85 3.85 3.65 90 9.55 9.25 7.90 4.60 3.75 3.45 100 9.10 8.85 7.65 4.65 3.55 3.25 110 8.90 8.60 7.35 4.35 3.40 3.20 120 8.50 8.25 7.15 4.20 3.30 3.20 130 8.05 7.80 6.70 3.80 3.25 3.05 140 7.75 7.50 6.05 3.70 3.10 3.05 150 7.50 7.25 C.30 3.65 3.15 3.05 160 7.20 7.00 6.90 3.55 3.15 3.00 170 7.05 6.80 5.80 3.40 3.35 3.05 180 7.30 7.05 6.00 5.72 3.35 2.95 190 6*55 6.35 5.35 3.60 3.30 3.05 200 7.15 6.95 5.95 3.75 3.20 2.95 210 7.25 7.05 6.05 3.80 3.26 3.05 220 7.56 7.30 6.35 3.90 ^ 3.85 3.25 250 8.05 7.80 6.75 4.10 3.45 3.35 240 8.30 8.05 7.00 4.25 3.60 3.40 250 8.55 8.35 7.25 4.50 3.75 3.45 260 8.85 8.65 7.45 4.50 3.65 3.65 270 9.10 8.95 7.80 4.70 3.80 3,65 280 9.36 9.20 7.95 4.80 3.95 3.60 290 9.50 9.35 8.05 4.85 3.85 3.45 300 9.90 9.60 8.30 4.85 4.00 3.65 310 10.26 9.85 8.50 4.95 4.10 4.70 320 10.40 10.30 8.90 5.10 4.15 4.45 330 10.56 10.30 d.95 5.25 4.10 3.50 340 10.66 10.45 9.10 5.30 4.15 3.55 360 10.85 10.50 9.20 5.30 4.15 3.65 360 10.90 10. G5 9.30 5.25 4.20 3.55 - Ov - 9L^k^: iO a. zodoal ^f^tmO oXsscS laoil QociB&Bid fi..'. ,0 9A.Z cis.a crCLB OF - 47 - TABLE Y PULSATING FIOK rC FRESSUEE, q, IH INCHES OF WATKK X Dlatanoe from llozzlo Center inches De£p*««s 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 to 2.5 V 10 8.20 8.05 7.95 6.95 5.80 4,65 4.05 3.60 20 8.20 8.10 7.90 6.96 5.80 4.66 4.00 3.60 30 8.30 8.16 7.90 7,00 5.95 4.G5 4.05 3.65 40 8.U 7.95 7.70 6.86 5.76 4.50 4.00 3,60 50 7.85 7.70 7.70 6.66 5.66 4.50 3.90 3.60 GO 7.90 7.30 7.50 G.60 5.60 4.56 4.05 3.70 70 7.60 7.40 7.20 6.36 5.55 4.36 3.95 3.60 80 7.60 7.36 7.50 6.16 5.56 5.00 4.00 3.65 90 7.20 7.00 6.72 G.09 S.22 4.30 3.90 3.50 100 7.00 C.80 6.55 5.80 5.15 4.06 3.68 3.40 110 6.75 6.50 6.40 b,6S 4.90 4.05 3.80 3.30 120 6.50 6.30 6.10 5.50 4.76 0.90 3.53 3.50 150 6.35 6.10 5.90 5.35 4.60 5.75 3.50 3.20 140 6.10 5,86 5.85 n.l2 4.41 3.70 3.44 3.20 160 5.90 5.76 5.40 5.00 4.32^ 3.52 3.30 3.00 160 5.66 5.00 5.15 4.86 4.25 3.50 3.25 3.00 170 5.31 5.10 4.75 4.51 3.96 3.40 3.10 2,90 180 5.60 5.40 5.07 4.75 4.20 3.50 3.25 5.00 190 5.40 5.20 4.90 4.60 4.10 4.10 3,20 2.95 200 5.50 v/ • bO s.oo 4.59 4.20 3.55 3.25 2.90 210 5.50 5.26 5.15 4.30 4.30 3.40 3.23 3.00 220 5.80 5.68 5.35 5.00 4.40 3.71 3,30 3.10 250 6.10 5.90 5.70 5.16 4,55 3.85 3.50 3.20 240 6.27 6.02 5.88 5.25 4.60 3.90 3,59 3.30 260 6.70 6.40 6.20 5,60 4.90 4.11 3.70 3.45 260 6.85 6.66 6.35 5.75 5.10 4.20 3.80 5.6u 270 7.00 6.36 6.66 5.95 5.20 4.30 3.90 3.60 280 7.15 6.96 6.75 G.OO 5.35 4.40 3.90 3.60 290 7.30 7.10 6.95 6.16 5.40 4.46 3.31 3.60 300 7.50 7.30 7.05 C.30 5.45 4.40 3.90 3.50 310 7.75 7.50 7.30 G.40 5.60 4.40 3.85 3.50 320 7.73 7.60 7.34 G.50 5.55 4.40 3.90 5.60 »30 8.00 7.S6 7.50 6.70 5.70 4.35 3.95 3.66 340 8.15 7.96 7.70 G.70 5.70 -' . 50 3.95 3.60 350 8.13 7.96 7.70 6.80 5.36 4.60 4.00 3.55 360 8.25 8.06 7.90 G.90 5.95 ..55 4,02 3.60 '■iij iiahUi.i i(ii tp I r.i ji.xAt.i\i v> cucnrs ^ oXjiw 3.S o:f I.X S.O T.O 5.0 5.C u«V X .0 0.0 ••••QeU 0: . ■ v-^ ^ , ■ - 01 c . .d cs = . ; ■-8 0£ ( # J..X.8 0^ C'..,'^. .Y oa '*',"" •- v.- • ; .V oa - . OS.Y .T ov (3 >- ■■ : ■ 02. T .Y 08 Oc,.^ /■>»-• ^ .Y 08 0^'.; .T 001 0^.''^ . . , .3 OIX c % . ■•.• . J OSX o::. . ■» CJ oei 0?:. d&.« 'Ji . a 0*X 00. r: /^. ■""\3 oex 0(. . . , .5 oax G'..; , te.2 OYX c<.,? • ,e 081 8C.S' .3 oex ce.s oe.cj oos cc. oxs CI . •:•. , .d OSS OS. •: OT.c 0X^3 05S Oi.6 " '■ ■■ ^ . H o^s .a 03 S . (3V. -. as.?) oas L. , \Y OYS O:-.- .Y OBS CL. .Y oes c-.- . . T ocs Cc.r « ._ * ' Oil g; CJ^.» OS! 2?. . •-. . 0£S OiJ . ■'! ». . • 1 O^i dc. ' OT.T .3 OdS Oo . . oe.T o;k«6 Od£ - 48 - TABLE YI PULSATING PLOf CYCLii OF DYKAKIC . iE, q, IN IMCHSS CP WATIE X D • 21 Distance fron tiozslo Center, Inches l^e^ees 0.0 0.6 1.2 l.S 1.5 to 2.5 10 5.02 4.50 4.00 3.80 3.60 20 5.18 4.65 4.15 3.95 3.65 30 5.23 4.70 4.20 4.00 7.70 40 5.02 4.65 4.15 3.95 3.50 50 4.95 4.50 4.10 3.90 3.50 60 5.00 4.50 4.10 3.90 3.70 70 4.85 4.40 4.00 3.80 3.65 30 4.80 4.26 3.85 3.75 3.75 90 4.70 4.15 3.85 3.75 3.65 100 4.47 4.05 3.75 3.75 3.46 110 4.30 3.95 3.65 3.55 3.50 120 4.25 3.85 3.55 3.45 3.40 130 4.20 3.85 3.55 3.45 .-5 .35 140 4.15 3,75 3.45 3.35 3.30 160 4.1 3.75 3.45 3.35 3.50 160 4.0 3.60 3.40 3.30 3.20 170 3.95 3.60 3.30 3.10 3.10 180 4.05 3.50 3.40 3.30 3.30 190 3.95 3.40 3.30 3.20 3.20 200 3.85 3.60 3.40 3.50 3.10 210 4.05 3.40 3.30 3.20 T.20 220 4.15 3.40 3.40 3.30 3.50 230 4.2 3.50 3.30 3.20 3.20 240 4.06 3.75 3.50 3.40 3.40 250 4.20 3.75 3.60 3.50 3.50 260 4.40 3.75 3.75 3.65 3.55 270 4.66 4.00 3.75 3.65 3.65 280 4.65 4.10 3.80 3.70 3.50 290 4.75 4.30 4.00 3.80 3.65 300 4.80 4.40 4.00 3.80 3.50 310 4.95 4.66 4.05 3.85 3.70 320 4.90 4.60 4.10 3.90 3.50 330 4.95 4.45 4.05 3.85 3.65 340 5.08 4.56 4.16 3.96 3.65 9t0 5.18 4.70 4-«eo 4.00 3.70 tk> 5.18 4.70 4.20 4.00 3.50 e 9j I y !T : 3I>.S Oo*'^ - 8* - XS -71 018 - 49 - TABLE VII puLSATisG rum CTCU OF DTSAKIC FRE8MK, q, IN IfiCHKS OP WATEK F • 24^ Ms tance from Hotz la Center, inches 0.0 Degrees 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.6 to 2.5 10 4.75 4.60 4.50 3.96 3.70 3.66 20 4.75 4.60 4.20 4.05 3.75 3.66 SO 4.70 4.50 4.20 3.95 3.75 3.55 40 4.60 4.55 4.00 3.85 3.70 3.46 60 4.70 4.50 4.10 4.05 3.85 3.60 60 4.80 4.60 4.20 4.05 3.90 3.76 TO 4.80 4.60 4.20 4.20 4.00 3.75 80 4.76 4.55 4.20 4.10 3.90 3.75 90 4.60 4.25 4.05 4.05 3.85 3.65 100 4.55 i.20 3.86 3.85 3.65 3.45 110 4.25 4.20 3.90 3.90 3.75 3.55 120 4.15 4.15 3.75 3.75 3.55 3.35 130 4.15 4.10 3.76 3.66 3.55 3.40 140 4.10 4.05 3.70 3.65 3.45 3.25 150 4.00 4.00 3.66 5.65 3.45 3.25 160 5.9 3.95 3.46 5.65 3.40 3.25 170 5.90 3.85 5.55 5.60 3.20 3.20 180 4.00 3.90 5.40 5.50 3.40 3.15 190 5.90 3.85 3.50 3.50 3.40 5.15 200 3.80 3.70 3.50 3.50 3.40 3.16 210 4.00 3.80 5.55 5.60 3.50 3.16 220 4.10 3.95 3.76 3.70 3.60 3.25 250 4.15 3.85 3.55 5.55 3.45 5.20 240 4.0 3.95 5.65 5.66 3.55 3.25 260 4.15 4.20 3.85 5.80 3.65 3.40 260 4.50 4.20 3.95 3.90 3.75 3.50 270 4.60 4.25 3.95 5.90 3.75 3.50 280 4.40 4.20 3.86 5.80 3.70 3.45 290 4.55 4.25 4.00 5.95 3.80 3.55 300 4.05 3.86 4.06 4.00 3.90 3.60 310 4.60 4.55 4.20 4.05 3.90 3.66 520 4.65 4.40 4.06 4.00 3.95 3.60 530 4.60 4.25 4.10 4.00 3.80 3.60 540 4.65 4.40 4.05 4.00 3.80 3.60 560 4.70 4.50 4.20 4.05 3.85 3.75 560 4.75 4.55 4.25 4.16 3.75 3.75 csy Si^ZJ li Y^ -fi,a i!u aaHOtti r.A ^p t.;i.^. .«, ^iJiAara "^ sjdtd X .0 .* c ex. ► \» V - 50 - TABLE YIII PULSATIHG FLOPr CYCLE OP DYNAMIC PRESSURE , q, IH INCHES OF WATHl |-"i Distance fron Koxfle Center, inches ^^ Decree 0.2 0.9 1.5 1.7 to 2.5 0.4 10 4.25 3.85 3.80 3.70 20 4.40 4.00 3.85 3.75 30 4.25 3.85 3.75 3.60 40 4.15 3.75 3.65 3.55 50 4.25 3.85 3.75 3.70 CO 4.40 4.00 3.90 3.80 70 4.40 4.00 3.90 3.85 80 4.30 4.00 3.90 3.80 90 4.05 3.75 3.65 3.75 100 3.95 3.75 3.65 3.55 110 3.95 3.75 3.65 3.50 120 3.85 3.75 3.65 3.40 130 3.85 3.70 3.60 3.40 140 3.75 3.65 3.55 3.30 150 3.70 3,65 3.55 3.30 160 3.70 3.60 3.50 3.30 170 3.70 3.60 3.50 3.20 180 3.60 3.50 3.40 3.20 190 3.50 3.40 3.30 3.20 200 3.35 3.25 3.15 3.20 210 3.55 3.45 3.35 3.20 220 3.75 3.65 3.55 3.40 230 3.70 3.60 3.50 3.25 240 3.75 3.60 3.50 3.30 250 3.95 3.75 3.65 3.50 260 4.00 3.80 3.70 3.50 270 4.05 3.85 3.75 3.60 280 4.00 3.80 3.76 3.50 230 4.05 3.85 3.75 3.60 300 3,60 3.40 3.30 3.70 310 4.20 3.90 3.80 3.75 320 4.20 3.90 3.80 3.70 330 4.10 3.80 3.70 3.70 340 4.20 3,80 3.70 3.70 350 4.30 3,90 3.80 3.76 380 4.30 3,90 3.80 3.75 7i .0 ^ *i . Ok, Oc . :uii it. OS :r.L nn»; - 51 - TABLS IX puLsmerLOi CYCU. OK DYNAMIC PRBSSURE, q, IK INCHES OF WATKR Distance from liossle Center, inches oTo Degree 0.2 0.7 1.3 1.8 to 2.5 0.4 10 4.25 4.05 3.85 3.70 20 4.20 4.00 3.80 3.75 30 4.20 4.00 3.80 3.60 40 4.00 3.80 3.70 3.55 50 4.05 3.85 3.75 3.70 60 4.15 5.95 3.86 3.80 70 4.20 4.00 3.90 3.85 80 4.20 4.00 3.90 3.80 90 4.05 5.85 3.76 3.75 100 3.85 3.75 3.65 3.55 110 3.90 3.80 3.70 3.55 120 3.75 5.65 3,55 3,40 130 3.75 3. 05 3.S5 3.40 140 3.70 5.60 3.50 3.30 150 3.60 5.60 5.50 3.30 160 3.50 3.50 3.45 3.30 170 3.55 3.50 3.40 3.20 180 3.40 5.55 3.30 3.20 190 3.30 3.25 3.26 3.20 200 3.30 3.25 3.20 3.20 210 3.55 5.45 3.35 3.20 220 3.75 5.65 3.55 3.40 230 3.55 5.45 5«55 3.25 240 3.60 5.50 3.40 3.30 250 3.85 5.70 5.60 3.50 260 3.95 5.85 3.75 3.60 270 3.95 3.85 3.75 3.60 280 3.85 3.75 3.70 3.50 290 4.00 5.90 3.80 3.60 300 4.05 5.95 3.75 5.70 310 4.15 3.95 3.75 3.75 320 4.05 3.90 3.70 3.70 330 4.10 5.90 3.75 3.70 340 4.05 5.95 3.75 3.70 350 4.20 4.00 3.80 3.76 360 4.25 4.05 3.80 3.75 - i« - OS ■ -r S,S ->:- .1 ^1 On 0.: o c: C 0.. c c c\ ev. cv, ov CT 3Y.£ or OY.S 05^1 - 58 - TABLE X MA-TTT FVUanm plot -?f3PTL» CTCLK CP DYNAMIC PRESSURE, q, IK ITICKES OF WlTBl i v^ Degree ^-39 V.9X - 40 3.70. 20 ^0 w • ^^ 3.75 SO S.60 40 3.55 50 3.70 60 3.80 TO 3.86 80 8.80 90 3.75 100 3.55 110 3.60 120 3.50 ISO 3.40 140 3.30 150 3.30 160 S.SO 170 S.20 180 3.20 190 3.20 200 3.20 210 3.20 220 5.40 250 3.25 240 3.30 250 3.50 260 3.60 270 3.60 280 3.50 290 3.60 300 3.70 810 3.75 320 3.70 330 3.70 340 3.70 350 3.75 360 3.75 L Vf 4«t ^.78 -^ .78 5,T6 .'3-75 - se - es « ~ 9 ST; 0 01 OS OS dd.S €t»£ Cr.r Ud.^ -.'U 3t.C oe 68, ^ cox oil rs£ 31 os.s OS. 5 CCI - 55 - TABLi. XI MAXIXDM LT]1AUIC nOttVBB FRQPILS q, INCHES OF WlTER PttUatlng J«t i 5 5 9 12 21 24.5 27.6 30 39 0 15.8 15.45 14.25 11.25 8.3 5.2 4.75 4.4 4.2 3.75 .1 15.3 15. 14.75 13.85 12.7 10.75 9.25 8.1 4.75 4.4 3.76 .2 7.9 4.4 4.2 3.76 .S 14.1 13.40 10.0 G.95 3.76 .4 11.96 10.9 7.5 4.6 4.4 4.2 3.76 .5 9.75 7.06 5.05 5.25 5,8 5.75 •6 4.05 5.60 3.76 .T 3.5 3.85 4.66 4.0 3.75 • 8 3.5 3.5 4.65 4.2 3.76 .9 3.5 3.5 3.55 4,0 4,0 5,76 1.0 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.75 4.05 5.76 1.1 3.4 3.5 3.5 3,55 3.6 3.75 1.2 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.6 4.15 3.76 1.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.95 3.8 3.76 1.4 3.4 3.5 3.5 3,55 3.6 3.75 S.75 1.5 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.56 3.6 3.65 3.8 3.75 1.6 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.65 3.65 3.75 1.7 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.65 5.75 3.75 1.8 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.65 3.65 3.76 3.76 3.76 2.5 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.55 3.6 5.65 5.65 3.76 3.75 3.76 \? 65 OZ 8.TS d.J^S IS il r;7.S S;« K# av.E 3V.C O.N 8.5 '-I. 3Kai 3.31 0 - I. '- • 1. , .il #. r 3. 3. i> • L> 'j* • 9.^. e. . ^•S O.L . K T I.i S.I CO i- • c> k.l ?.S ^.5 a. I .1 , 3.S - 54 - TABU. XII .MUUHOM DYIIAmC i'Uz^ijbiii PROPILS q, mowtt (V mm Pulaatlnc Jet $ f° 3 5 9 12 21 24.5 27.5 30 0 9.95 9.70 9.0 7.05 5.31 3.95 3.90 3.7 3.65 0.1 9.4 8.6 6.8 5.1 0.2 9.3 9.10 7.9 5.8 4.75 3.7 •« 0.3 8.6 8.20 6.1 4.51 A 0.4 6.9 6.35 4.45 3.96 3.85 3.7 0.5 5.4 4.6 3.23 3.4 .4 0,6 3.16 '>4 0,7 3.00 3.15 3.4 3.5 4 0*8 3.00 2.95 3.6 3.65 0i9 3.00 2.95 3.05 3.1 3.6 1.0 3.05 3.00 2.95 3.05 3.50 1.1 3.05 3.00 2.95 3.05 2*9 »«4 1.2 3.05 3.00 S.95 3.05 2*9 3.3 ',4 1.5 3.05 3.00 £.95 3.05 2.9 3.1 3.4 -4 1.4 3.05 3.00 2.95 3*05 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.5 .4 1.5 3.05 2.00 2.95 3.05 2.9 3.1 3.2 JL 1.6 3.05 3.00 i.95 3.05 2.9 3.1 3.2 1.7 3.05 3.00 £.95 3.05 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.2 1.8 3.05 3.00 £.95 3.05 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.2 5.2 2.5 3.05 3.00 2.95 3.05 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 - #3 - 'r'?A",T "^ 2t"*?:-T rhJaelLr^ Si (j 9 X Y 3ii,t T.s oe.s 3.C i.r. w « ".-• 3V.^ IS. q ^ v.s S8.S se. a.s OG.o j«l^« «i/ .0 V , >*J ^•0 '», .?. 3,0 ^.0 5.r. 6«s s.s s.s s.s x.s e.s no. o.i , *.! . 5.1 . a,x .^ Y.I . , 8.1 uO.ci gO.S d«S - 68 - TABLE XI 11 unuin MT -TATE LYHAinc rii;SSliEE PEOPILB 4, INCHES OF WATER 4, Lacium or waiar Piilsatini^ Jet z X 1 i ^ « C ° 3 5 9 12 21 24.5 27.6 30 39 0 11.4 lia5 10.35 8.06 6.35 4.20 4.15 3.85 3.75 3.4 0.1 iO.85 10.0 7.8 6.1 3.4 0.2 iO.7 10.5 9.1 6.7 5.9 4.15 3.4 0.3 9.85 9.55 7.05 5,35 3.4 0.4 8.10 7.8 5.20 4.10 3.85 3.75 3.4 0.5 6.50 5.10 4.02 5.8 4.60 3.4 0.6 3.25 3.25 3.4 0.7 3.25 3.20 5.4 3.75 S.G5 3.4 o.a 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.85 3.75 3.4 0.9 3.25 3.20 3.20 5.25 3.50 3.7 3.4 1.0 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.25 3*65 3.4 1.1 3.25 2.20 3.20 3.25 3.20 3.4 1.2 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.25 3.20 3.55 3.4 1.3 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.25 3.20 3.45 3.55 3.4 1.4 3.25 3.20 S.20 3.25 3.20 3.55 3.4 1.5 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.25 3.20 3.S5 3.6 3.4 1.6 3.25 O.20 3.20 3.25 3,20 3.35 3.4 3.4 1.7 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.25 3.20 3.35 5.4 3.4 3.4 1.8 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.25 3.20 3.35 3.4 3.4 3.4 5.4 - 32 - 5STf -^r ''^i-^-iT c^eL 3«l.:t»< ee 0 a a K8 ST. .5 til.^ os.^ ds.d ciO,t' He. >. rr C K8 X.B I.O KS ei.j^ e.3 1 • -J. s.o >.S 6S.e ^8, ,e s.o ^•S 8V. .5 01.^ 3 *.o KS or. ^.0 ^.5 .0 c» t.c r • w ev.s Cu.o . '-\0 ^aO V.5 oe.:. dP. A #.e la.s Gl. ».e os.s an.c .i ^.s sa.s 0£.£ es.5 f • a. ».£ ?.3.£ 2^.0 OS.? d.i . >.S 36. r ^ . . .- ^ i^.x KS D,^ - ^-> 3.1 *.s i' . I ^ i-^i *^» ** co.C T.I i , ^.'■. 3?.:^ 8.1 - 56 - TABLI-: XIV DTIAUIC ISKSan PROFILE Steady Flam - Internediato Value q, inches of water §C0 3 5 9 12 16 21 24.5 27.5 30 0 11,4 10.7 10.3 7.6 5.9 4.3 3.4 3.2 2.95 2.9 0.1 11.3 10.6 9.8 7.3 5.9 4.2 3.4 3.15 2.95 2.9 0.2 10.7 10.2 6.5 5.4 4.2 3.35 3.10 2.9 2.9 .ZB 0.3 9.4 9.1 C.2 6.2 4.C 4.1 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.85 0»4 7.1 6.1 4.6 4.8 4.2 S.9 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.7 0.5 5.9 3.7 2.9 3.9 3.5 3.4 3.0 2.95 2.85 2.65 0,6 2.3 2.5 2.4 3.4 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.90 2.8 2.6 0.7 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.9 3.0 2.85 2.75 2.6 0.8 2.2 2,3 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.6 0.9 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.6 2rr 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 1.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.55 2.55 2.6 2.5 1*2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.45 2.55 2.45 1.3 2*3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.45 1.4 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.45 2.45 1.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.45 1.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.45 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.45 « as - ei: 01 •i ^.IX 0 ?.s I.O £•0 . .) - 57 - TABIZ XV Lin«8 of Conatant ^"i*^.. liftxiBBim Value, ?ul«atinc Flow 4\^^' .057 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 «— »>p^— ii I 111. Ill ....I I 0 .45 .40 .96 .28 S .58 .54 .51 .49 .45 .42 .39 .38 .30 .22 5 .60 .52 .46 .40 .35 .31 .26 .21 .15 9 .65 .53 .59 .35 .26 .18 .08 12 .90 .68 .50 .39 21 1.22 .72 24.5 1.08 27.5 .90 30 .70 - Vd - V^ ■7 T r -" ~ seniJ . .;^, iiisj.' . .■j;'Ai:'v ;."\jr;i jvj».. — /* :5. 51. IS. • « '.•."* • s*# ^' ' • IG. t»C. . -r-J. ci OS. IS, ee. • di^. 2d. Od. S 80. ■- J- • DS. * ■ - « 25. se. 3S. 9 '• 08. 8d. ST. SS.I SI IS cr ^^ OT, OS - 58 - lABLI:. XVI 1 Linea of Con«tant ^"^ MBimun Value, Pulsating Flow J> \ ^o^ - \ V = -^ '^ •^ 'S •* -S .6 .7 .8 ,9 0 .48 .43 .38 .33 .28 .21 8 .56 .53 .51 .48 .45 .42 .35 .29 .25 .15 6 .51 .44 .40 .36 .31 .27 .24 .20 .12 9 .52 .45 .36 .27 .20 .12 12 .72 .50 .30 .10 21 1.14 .52 24.6 l.SS .40 27.5 1.57 SO 1.50 - sa - JII£wi- c.:,ald ,i9yI»V nwniul" ;'C. i >v ' ~ as:.. 9 •■ • 1 1- 1 o " « ^^. Ic. o5. ae 21, OS. ^s. vs. ic",. D5. o>. ^« id SI. OS. vs. 01. OS. Of., 05. se 04>. A c 8 a e SI . \ S Co.. C£ - 69 • TABLE XYII Lines of Constant ***» Intarcwdiste slue. Pulsating Flow low F iO .04 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 .48 .44 .40 .35 .30 ,19 3 .55 .60 .53 .49 .4G .42 .40 5 .56 .50 .48 .42 .38 .34 .29 9 .59 .51 .44 .36 .29 .21 .14 12 .93 .75 .59 .39 .20 21 1.35 1.10 .23 24.5 1.55 .93 27.5 30 1.66 1.73 1.15 .88 V> • >^4 lactnl d Oik* 81. :..i is 3I«X do«x 6«Vi - 60 - XVIII Lines of Coaastant ^"^ . Intoraedlato Valuo, Staady Flow -\ V'^16 •! •* •* •♦ -S .« .7 .8 .9 0 .48 .42 .38 .92 .29 .22 S •88 .52 .47 .43 .39 .55 .32 .27 .23 .14 5 .67 .58 .52 .46 .39 .32 .25 .17 .11 9 .87 .62 .48 .59 .50 .21 12 1.0 ,54 .40 .24 21 1.19 24.5 1.26 27.5 1.35 30 1.4 ') lO £ V 1; 0 Xi ta. d» Yd. 'v i* e oX OV>*L ?.4t2 uo* « 'w* I . d^*i QZ • 61 - TABLE Z2Z q-qi Lines of CoBotwit ^-Q» a- 3.0 OX.l 8X».0 oTX.O ?.e.o er.s T.O s^.x 80S.0 aeo.o os.o 05.5 e.o ♦v.x 0 0 0 os.s x.x - 64 - TAMU xxn RCmiLIZXD TBLOeXTT IMTZUBI il . 21 D ? q r^ r 0 3.4 1.0 1.0 1*0 0.0 .1 3.4 1.0 1*0 1.0 0.11 •8 3.55 0.95 0.95 0.976 0.28 •S S.2 0.80 0.80 0.805 0.84 •4 sa 0.70 0.70 0.886 0.46 »8 3.0 0.60 o.ao 0.775 0.87 •6 2*9 0.60 0.50 0.706 0.68 •8 2.7 0.30 0.30 0.65 0.91 1*0 2.a 0.20 0.20 0.45 1*14 1.1 2.65 0.15 0«15 0.59 1.28 1.2 2*50 0.10 0.10 0.31 1.88 1.8 8.4 0 0 0 1.47 (b) PulB«d Flew ) vt'- ,C8 ^ To • 1.5 0 4.20 0.96 1 1 0 0.8 S.8S 0.80 0.527 0.726 0.69 1*2 8.65 OJtO 0.2U 0.460 1.04 1*8 3.45 0.06 0.0527 0.229 1.128 1*6 3.85 0 0 0 1.3 !><'• O A* PS^^f) os.i/ »^ e 6 \ •V ,t: tic to V- I 4-. H 1^ ^- / I I ;A ■~, ^-J -. • Tt -Hl f! \-/- UJ Q. ^ ^ >A. 5; >===> r lO <: >> cv I ^ < o ^ ^ -^ o ^ o ^««... h- ^ k ^ ^ U. 1-u ^^ 'a: «-o © V > \ i e I i4 Fig, 2-a Control joanel for engine operation Fi^, 2-b Engine, blov/er, at'^ rnanifolu (The test set-up shown is not part of this experiment) i , , . _ — ..is a:''^ -. V-.-, »*-lf5>'»- -.^.*- ^, ,^ i i or "^e. • " tj ,iy, s:.^v.i;. o *"'* fc»^ * J-b' u, ~ri aJlT i. .k ^\ VAt-:TA?l6N OF •* : J ;_i . J H^ ^__^j ., . . j i-— p — hr-f. — j- r — ] : 1- ' with VALVu "• T- L_; J L L f-^- t "^^-l*": ^ -n l--i: {■ '>- f:~^u -,1 I . j t.:.,| rn^ I I ■ ■ ! • 1?^- ■frr: I • ^ ■ 4:.i .i.:i_..^:;.j^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^'- ^^ Manpneter Tubu V*Ap?/i"Tm| ■of! pv^-vrrd 'f-^ TTt Pulfe^tlnr^jFliovl ST J L- H- -f-i -p— T — r -K-. Fie.' ^,! Tr- ^-\-M- Kifirl-,' I ■ i ' -I J I L. i ■ = !•■ . t;;..i. ^i:,lr^ •[/■nj :- i--^'- .:|-- :K'-^r4- j'h^-j- '-'f'n: -t-+^r -1 ^- /.^ p. — r ■^•- *■ 1—— — ^_ // , L T-^-t^ !- 1" i- r^^r"!'-r-:-r H-f , — * — ,__5 pyn&nSc 4-.—^ ■^I f^ l-^ ^"t-T-tT7^ •!-t--i I 3^ "2 '?.^>- i-t-^^^T-^-aM'-^t-jTl;^ t^-T t~- T~l A- ^i I ..- j-.:.i;f "^-- "■ ..^!L^:a-: 1-t-r^--, 'C T TTT^ T' • j rprrrpr-Tpr-TnTrr-r-Trrm -r-1 — p 1 1 - U iiJl^v^i .■fee ^ItB. A,- m- -f-y- -^r:± , h: -^H . V : I: r.^lUb^_ ^^ 1r:!/T::^--l Lt _L ■■- -t- ■*■ -t -■ ■ ■! ..__J J i 1 L 11^' VI'. I : I — 4 -iu-^! i..r' 1 - 1 - < . I ■ : .1 t-^ -//- j^::-q.L;j-rj:::i.,i--K: ;:.-[, j;- j i-'--4: 1 • »• I ■ hr:i;.7tL.ii:,:.j; i:::i;.4^,4^: r -1 'I-'- -r-tn i.r^j^::! .r^u. i±o ~5pxv' -.'i-^ifi::^ .^fi^^f^.S H*4--t-^^ t~^ ■^ — j — — t-n — 4^-4-rl— [^•■'■-t-rrt-i-- -t^i i ^^> ■--^l -- ' 1 1 ' I ■ • - r '1 1^ r : [ ; i — i ^ i , 1 . . — I — . — 1 — 'V 'V=--'-fu.;'>! rt!,i. '.j M.|M,,j.j._|,....ji, L4-.-i--;. -J ^■{'■■■1 !..i.- !■• ■{:■■. !'-^ •'I •■■y-\ -(H:: — I • H -f-^-t- "I" BjilSj9;Ui*ijg;j -^o^*- :^- j^S^e - | - ;.- |- -- ^. — -I- t—^ BSft, ID #--4- -H-t-i-^ r-r^r- ^4—4 #N->R!:^-h'!:;.i::.i-'-n-iH^ T^~t --',.. V."\\..i it. ' t ■ ; i •N-^ ^.54^ j:.::i:::i3 t' — T~" -fTT-irr-h— rrrr I .T'j,,.. ; _■ J 4~-^- l;.- I.. ^##^^|^#^-H---t-^r-i-^^-%-I 4-f^^-4-#-N-^ -Ui^. -^•m: iL:i^:.:i - 1 . ■ 1 -r-5i -^1^^..-. ■t-3' "ir: M. J-r* i-J i ^-^KH-^1 'T""' t-^^r^i-N- ^ : ■:l-'-i-/ ^ ^'T-^f^^!-^^ ^M- ^- t^ -t— •- »■ M ■: — Tf — rr~ ili^iEt-:. :/l2 ■uj.,-.. /i-ifii^c* i^t^: T^S-j — 1; l 1 " L 'ii- lHi;H^;;i;Mq-^-4. ::Mt-.J- M'n! — i-'^-nimrrttii: 7p:,,|.i.;{J;,-|'..M..L-|..!.|.:|.^j.;, |:. :|, r-n ;.-^ :|'-:j — - \u:'\. I -'-:|'t:} '•!•:-' rr ^-f- M,^-' ^^-1- : i'-' I ■v--i'Wh'l:vJ-:-k-h:i'^^i:4-4'!---!:-M--!---|. 1— -j- .111 rrt-r r.:r I :.; ,..i. A '". 1 — 1 1 ! I'M i i 1 i --^ 1 1 J ■ i ■ ' ■ 1 ! V 1 j . 1 ! ; 1 . i ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : ^ 4 -- ► ' 1 1 1 1 ^ 1 ■ 1 ...,. 1 1 , i 1 1 1 •■1 ■ '•! ^l« ^ ; t L . ! ' *> 0^- '^ i ^ i ^^ . V i-* i .. ' ^ 1 ! *. i"^ '^ ^^ ^ >J' ^^ - -5--^ ; 1 -1 • It V ■ 1 1 ^ ftl ^ \ ^ — 1 ^^ ^ .1 ; : : 1 • 1 1 1 ;^ . i ':, ■; .| .; . - — - -i - . '■ • ^-' r '-■ 1 1 ! 1 ! i ■ i 1 , L \ ;..iir -;■ ■ 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 • . -4 J- ; t-H- . ■ 1 -r.-^ ! > !— ^ ■ _; ^ ! — 1 . — — ^ f A / ■/ r^ t 1 -r- 1 1 t i :t / / /c > 1 i t - 1 : ' ■ '/ 1 ' • 1 ^ — 1 i 1 v> D.^^ / Y : - . .. .'.■ -— , j ^ 5j ^ / / 1 ' • I. . > > 1 — ■ . i , ■ ■ — - - ' 1 t / ■I J — -- - — 1 ■ ! - _ i • ii ,. /HI -— — 1 1 1 II : 1 !• 1 • .. 1 ■ 1 ■; ■ ■ 1 ^ J .i . — 1 — 1 — 1 1 1 — -— — 1 t . 1 / 1^ • ■ ^i -— — \ ^ ! ! ■ 1 1 ^4 ^ X ^ 1 . 1 . 1 1 i 1 1 — p-^ • ; L .: - _ ... 1 1 1 1 _. .J — 1 1 !^ 4 1 1 1 1 i , 1 •!: 1 1 1 1 i 1 ! — 1 — 1 1 ■ --f . i i t ->— 4 — ! -f- &t 0 r- 1 — 1 — 1 1 - 1 L 1 1 1 1 U c — — s 1 1 i— « • d > * f> 1 1 1 1 i ' 1 ■ 1 — f- 'M?^w/ u?^D wMc/rr Feof/i 4— # IMS mm • ^ ' i -■ , 1 3 Thesis Beae 1G258 Burton m Preliminary investigation of the mixing of a ouls^tin^ air iet in a steady tggoMary alrflfw "^ ° DATS DUE BORHOVEB'S :TA)S